Related Article

* All product/brand names, logos, and trademarks are property of their respective owners.
If you’ve checked your Google Shopping results and wondered why you’re spending more but not seeing ROAS grow, you’re not alone. Many ecommerce brands tweak bids, test Performance Max, add negatives, or adjust budgets hoping for a breakthrough. Sometimes performance improves briefly, then flattens again. That’s because the real issue often isn’t inside the campaign—it’s inside the product feed. One of the most overlooked levers is the product_type attribute. It’s not just an optional field for compliance. Used strategically, it gives Google clearer context, smarter grouping, and better matching power, helping your products reach the right searches more consistently.
If you’re serious about improving ROAS in Google Shopping, you have to start thinking like both a marketer and a machine-learning system. Google doesn’t “read” your store the way a human does—it relies on your feed data to understand what you sell, who it’s for, and which searches your products should appear for.
That’s why Google Merchant Center optimization isn’t just about fixing disapprovals. It’s about giving Google the cleanest signals possible. And among all those signals, product_type is one of the most flexible—and most underused.

This confusion shows up in almost every account audit:
Google Product Category = mandatory classification based on Google’s taxonomy.
Product Type = your own custom category structure.
Think of Google Product Category like a form you must submit. It helps Google place you in the right “general” bucket, but you don’t get much control.
Product Type is your strategy layer. You can shape it around:
Your website navigation/breadcrumbs
Your merchandising priorities
How do you want to segment campaigns and budgets
This flexibility is exactly why product_type can improve:
search relevance (better matching to high-intent queries)
campaign control (clean segmentation for bidding and budgets)
Even though product_type isn’t visible to shoppers, it can be heavily weighted for relevance. A shallow value like:
Furniture
…doesn’t tell Google much.
But a structured value like:
Home & Garden > Furniture > Kitchen & Dining > Dining Tables
…adds context and intent. You’re telling Google:
broad department
subcategory
specific buying intent
That helps in two major ways:
Better long-tail matching
Long-tail searches often convert best because they’re purchase-ready. Deeper product types can support relevance for these searches by adding more accurate signals.
Stronger behavior in automation (Performance Max)
With Performance Max feed optimization, Google’s system explores your catalog and decides what to push. If your product types are broad or messy, you often see uneven spend and wasted budget. Clean product_type structure creates clearer clusters—so you get better distribution between winners and underperformers.
Here’s the truth: you can’t scale Google Shopping ROAS if your catalog is one big bucket. When everything sits inside “All Products,” your best items can get held back while low performers quietly burn budget. A ROAS-first product_type framework has three goals:
Build a multi-level hierarchy that gives Google context
Use that structure to segment campaigns and budgets
Use real keyword intent to improve relevance

Google recommends a breadcrumb-style structure that goes from broad to specific using the “ > ” symbol with spaces.
Example:
Electronics > Computers > Laptops
Levels 1–2 (Broad):
Use these for high-level segmentation and budget allocation, like:
Home & Garden > Furniture
Electronics > Audio
Apparel & Accessories > Women
Level 3+ (Specific):
This is where you capture intent and long-tail traffic:
Home & Garden > Furniture > Kitchen & Dining > Dining Tables
Apparel & Accessories > Women > Shoes > Running Shoes
Aim for 3 to 5 levels:
Too shallow = generic traffic and weaker control
Too deep = messy, unless your catalog is very consistent
A simple best practice: align product_type with your website navigation/breadcrumbs to keep your data consistent across teams and systems.
Once product_type is structured, use it to subdivide your product groups instead of relying on “All Products.”
Performance-Based Bidding:
Separate high-margin or top-selling product types into their own campaigns with higher budgets or different ROAS targets. This protects your winners and gives you predictable scaling.
Isolate Underperformers:
Identify product types with high spend and weak conversion. Move these into a “catch-all” campaign with lower bids or stricter ROAS targets—so they don’t drain budget from your top performers.
This is one of the fastest ways to improve Google Shopping campaign optimization without changing landing pages or rebuilding the entire account.
This is an advanced move many competitors skip: Use your Search Terms Report to improve product_type depth. If search terms show recurring intent patterns like:
“extendable dining table”
“round marble dining table”
“solid wood dining table”
You can reflect that intent at deeper levels—only where accurate—such as:
Home & Garden > Furniture > Kitchen & Dining > Dining Tables > Extendable
Key rules:
Reflect search intent, but keep it truthful
Avoid filler like “Free Shipping” or “Best Price.”
Don’t stuff synonyms that don’t describe the product
Keep internal consistency with your site navigation
Once you have the framework, the next step is scaling it. For large catalogs, manual product_type updates don’t work. This is where Merchant Center becomes a real performance tool.
Feed Rules let you automatically generate or modify product_type values inside Merchant Center without changing your source feed.
Examples:
Use brand, title, or existing categories to assign product_type
Standardize inconsistent naming across the catalog
Add missing hierarchy depth at scale
This is a major unlock for Google Shopping feed optimization because it keeps the structure consistent and scalable.
Many brands change budgets seasonally, but forget feed structure. Advanced advertisers adjust deeper product_type levels to match seasonal intent.
Examples:
Apparel > Outerwear > Winter Jackets > Holiday Gifts
Electronics > Audio > Headphones > Black Friday
These temporary layers can help capture timely demand and improve relevance when competition is highest.
Use Supplemental Feeds to test different product_type hierarchies on a subset of SKUs without touching your main feed.
You can safely test:
3-level vs 5-level hierarchies
Intent-based depth for top categories
New seasonal structures
Then scale what works across the full catalog.
A strong feed won’t improve ROAS if your campaign setup ignores it. Your product_type hierarchy should directly influence how you split product groups, campaigns, budgets, and bidding strategies.

Instead of targeting “All Products,” subdivide product groups by product_type clusters:
Electronics > Audio
Electronics > Computers
Home & Garden > Furniture
This gives you clean levers to:
fund winners
control spend on weaker segments
report performance in a way that makes business sense
Use your structure to align bidding:
Isolate high performers (high margin or stable ROAS) into dedicated campaigns with protected budgets
Contain underperformers in a low-priority/catch-all campaign to prevent budget leaks
In Performance Max, separate campaigns or asset groups by product_type clusters so the algorithm isn’t forced to average winners with losers
To maximize Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) using the product_type attribute, you have to move beyond basic setup and treat it as a strategic tool.
When you implement structured, multi-level product types (3–5 levels deep), you unlock three big benefits:
Better context for Google’s algorithm and search relevance
Cleaner segmentation for campaign and budget control
Smarter bidding decisions—especially in automated systems
Your action plan:
Expand product_type into a consistent breadcrumb hierarchy
Align it with your site navigation and real search intent
Segment campaigns based on product_type performance
Isolate winners and contain underperformers
Use Feed Rules and Supplemental Feeds to automate and test
Structure drives segmentation. Segmentation drives bidding control. Bidding control drives ROAS. If you want maximum ROAS, don’t just optimize bids—optimize the foundation that tells Google what you actually sell.
Mushraf Baig is a content writer and digital publishing specialist focused on data-driven topics, monetization strategies, and emerging technology trends. With experience creating in-depth, research-backed articles, He helps readers understand complex subjects such as analytics, advertising platforms, and digital growth strategies in clear, practical terms.
When not writing, He explores content optimization techniques, publishing workflows, and ways to improve reader experience through structured, high-quality content.
19 January 2026
Be the first to share your thoughts
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Share your thoughts and join the discussion below.